Category: Uncategorized

by Katy Purington

 

The Carlisle Indian Industrial School in Carlisle, Pennsylvania was the first federally-funded Indian boarding school in the United States. Founded in 1879 by Captain Richard Henry Pratt, it became the model for 26 other federal boarding schools and hundreds of privately sponsored schools across the country. Between 1879 and 1918, more than 10,000 children from at least 140 tribes were brought to the school, most by force. Students learned English, trade skills, and Western customs. After the school closed in 1918, records related to the school became scattered across the country. The majority of the school’s official records are located in the US National Archives in Washington, DC, while other resources, including administrative ledgers, student photographs, and school newspapers, are held in private collections as well as the Cumberland County Historical Society and the Dickinson College Archives & Special Collections.

The Carlisle Indian School Digital Resource Center, started in 2013, was created to make it easier for families, communities, researchers, and educators to access records related to the Carlisle Indian School. It is led by College Archivist Jim Gerencser, Sociology Professor Susan Rose, and Special Collections Librarian Malinda Triller-Doran, and sustained by the efforts of many undergraduate interns and volunteers. According to the website’s mission page, the project “aims to develop a comprehensive searchable database of Carlisle Indian School resources.” The project’s stated goals include creating a searchable database using the information found in the digitized resources, developing a platform for the families and communities of former students to contribute records and images related to the school, and developing curriculum for teachers of all levels based on materials in the database. It is a massive project that is still a long way from being finished.

The largest collection of records available through the Resource Center are student files from the Records of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, housed at the National Archives in Washington DC. So far, over 6000 student files have been digitized, by student interns who travel to DC during school breaks. Other content includes images from a number of sources, publications produced by the Carlisle Indian School, and lists and ledgers containing information about school activities. Visitors to the website can also find information regarding the people buried in the cemetery of the Carlisle Indian School.

This past summer, Gerencser and Rose organized a one-week Teachers’ Institute on the Carlisle Indian School. The discussions among the teachers and Institute organizers resulted in the creation of a number of lesson plans and other resources for teaching the material, now available on the Resource Center website.

A team of project leaders has partnered with a number of Native communities that experienced the removal of large populations of children to the school. At events hosted in community centers, they demonstrate how to use the resources hosted on the website, as well as encouraging members of these communities to share their own stories about their family and friends who attended the school. In August 2017 , the Resource Center provided key resources in the Northern Arapaho nation’s successful bid to reclaim the remains of three boys who died while attending the School, and were buried in the cemetery. The students, whose identities were confirmed using school cemetery records and class rosters uploaded to the site, were disinterred and transported to Wyoming, where they were reburied by their families.

As more records are made accessible through the site, it will become easier for Native communities to track down students and find evidence of the lives they led during and after their years at the Carlisle Indian School. It will be important for the project leaders to continue their efforts in teaching members of the public, especially in communities impacted by the school, how to search for and use the available resources. The project has the potential to become a more powerful resource once it is better known.

 

 

 

 

 

by Kathleen Mackenzie

Walking the streets of Dublin today, reminders of the 1916 Easter Rising are scattered throughout the city. The armed rebellion against British rule launched a turbulent period that ultimately led to the establishment of the Republic of Ireland, and the Irish people have taken care to ensure that the rebellion’s leaders are never forgotten. Indeed, their names grace countless street signs, monuments, and buildings throughout the city. Their words are memorialized on the walls of train stations, restaurants, and theaters. But what about the voices of ordinary people who lived through the turmoil of 1916 in Ireland, but whose names were lost to history? For the most part, these voices have remained absent from the popular narrative of the revolution—until now.

“The Letters of 1916: A Year in the Life” is Ireland’s first crowd-sourced public history project. It began in 2013 with a nationwide call for letters written between November 1, 1915 and October 31, 1916 that pertained to life in Ireland.[1] Topics ranging from politics, to romance, to the mundane would all be accepted.[2] Donors were allowed to keep the physical letters and send in a scans, and project staff scanned letters if the donors were unable to.[3] The results were astonishing: 2,400 letters were donated by members of the public and historical institutions, and 1,500 volunteers transcribed them.[4] By the Easter Rising’s centenary in 2016, a fully-fledged digital archive website was launched, making these letters available to the public for the first time. Among the collection is Eamonn O’Modhráin’s letter sent from a Welsh prison camp to his mother, assuring her that he is attending mass while being held prisoner for his participation in the Rising.[5] Also included is a love letter from James Finn to his fiancé May Fay, in which he asks her to pray that there wouldn’t be a second rebellion so that their wedding plans wouldn’t be ruined.[6] Other letters discuss school, family affairs, the Great War, religion, and much more.

The project was led by Susan Schreibman, Professor of Digital Humanities at the National University of Ireland Maynooth, and was funded by the institution along with support from the Digital Repository of Ireland, the National University of Ireland, Trinity College Dublin, and the Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht.[7] The goal of the project was to preserve and bring to life the stories of average people living in Ireland in 1916. As Schreibman has noted, “All too often our emphasis is on the grand narrative focusing on key political figures…we want to try to get a sense of how ordinary people coped with one of the most disruptive periods in contemporary Irish history.”[8] By devoting an entire digital archive to the letters of ordinary people, the project not only paints a fuller picture of history, but it also underscores the value of stories outside of the traditional historical narrative. This certainly presents a marked contrast to the statues and plaques dedicated to the Rising’s leaders that line the streets of Dublin.

It is also important to note that the process of collecting and transcribing the letters was in many ways just as significant as the final product of the digital archive. By allowing the public to contribute to the collection, the project gave them the opportunity to take ownership of their own history in a way that was uniquely suited to the needs of the country. Ireland’s history has long been shaped by colonial rule and political and religious conflict, which has given way to drastically different perspectives on national identity and history throughout the country. While other public history projects have encouraged the public to shape their own historical narrative, “Letters of 1916” purposefully resists a singular narrative. As Shreibman notes, “[the letters] create a mosaic of life lived, messy and complex, eschewing our notions of a collective past that tends to be flattened by a method of narrative that historians employ in writing for the page.”[9] By placing a nationwide call for any and all letters written in 1916, the project quietly and effectively legitimized the myriad of perspectives and experiences surrounding a painful and divisive moment in Ireland’s history.

Thanks to the success of the project, “The Letters of 1916” recently received a grant from the Irish Research Council to extend its collection period to include letters through 1923.[10] If you would like to submit a letter to the project, to volunteer to transcribe previously submitted letters, or to simply search and browse this rich and extensive collection, please visit letters1916.maynoothuniversity.ie.

 

References

Finn, James. “Letter from James Finn to May Fay, 27th May 1916”. Letters of 1916. Schreibman, Susan, Ed. Maynooth University: 2016. http://letters1916.maynoothuniversity.ie/explore/letters/348.

Letters of 1916. Letters 1916-1923: Ordinary Lives – Extraordinary Times. http://letters1916.maynoothuniversity.ie/

O’Modhráin, Eamonn. “Letter from Eamonn O’Modhrain to Mary Moran, 3 July 1916”. Letters of 1916. Schreibman, Susan, Ed. Maynooth University: 2016. http://letters1916.maynoothuniversity.ie/explore/letters/333.

Schreibman, Susan. “Public Invited to co-create 1916 Letters Project.” The Irish Times. August 4, 2014. https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/heritage/public-invited-to-co-create-1916-letters-project-1.1887075

Trinity News and Events. “Letters of 1916 Research Project Calling on Public to Contribute Family Letters.” September 24, 2013. https://www.tcd.ie/news_events/articles/letters-of-1916-research-project-calling-on-public-to-contribute-family-letters/4405

 

[1] Trinity News and Events. “Letters of 1916 Research Project Calling on Public to Contribute Family Letters.” September 24, 2013. https://www.tcd.ie/news_events/articles/letters-of-1916-research-project-calling-on-public-to-contribute-family-letters/4405

[2] Ibid.

[3] Schreibman, Susan. “Public Invited to co-create 1916 Letters Project.” The Irish Times. August 4, 2014. https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/heritage/public-invited-to-co-create-1916-letters-project-1.1887075.

[4] Schreibman.

[5] O’Modhráin, Eamonn. “Letter from Eamonn O’Modhrain to Mary Moran, 3 July 1916”. Letters of 1916. Schreibman, Susan, Ed. Maynooth University: 2016. http://letters1916.maynoothuniversity.ie/explore/letters/333.

[6] Finn, James. “Letter from James Finn to May Fay, 27^th May 1916”. Letters of 1916. Schreibman, Susan, Ed. Maynooth University. 2016. http://letters1916.maynoothuniversity.ie/explore/letters/348.

[7] Schreibman.

[8] Trinity News and Events.

[9] Schreibman.

[10] Letters of 1916. Letters 1916-1923: Ordinary Lives – Extraordinary Times. http://letters1916.maynoothuniversity.ie/

by Sacha Mankins

The YIVO Institute for Jewish Research is a Manhattan-based archive on Eastern European Jewish life before the Holocaust. YIVO (the name stands for Yiddisher Visnshaflikher Institut, Yiddish for “Jewish Scientific Institute”) was originally founded in the 1920s in Lithuania, with the purpose of documenting Jewish culture and folklore in Eastern Europe. The Institute formed a New York City branch early on in its life, which became the only branch after the destruction of Lithuanian Jewry in the Holocaust.

YIVO today is a thriving center for Yiddish culture, not only preserving and exhibiting objects from an invaluable archival collection, but also hosting an intensive six-week Yiddish language program every year. The audience is chiefly, but broadly, Jewish. YIVO’s outreach programs both emphasize the importance of remembering what was lost in the Holocaust, and capitalize on widespread American Jewish affection for the culture of Eastern Europe, the culture of most of our parents and grandparents.

YIVO does outreach through traditional and electronic mailings, social media, exhibiting and hosting lectures: all of the methods one would expect from a cultural heritage center. The “Yiddish Quizzes” hosted on the Institute’s website offer a less expected form of outreach. Multiple-choice quizzes of the type made popular on sites like Buzzfeed, the Yiddish Quizzes teach lessons from the YIVO archives through humorous tests of cultural knowledge. Humor is an important and well-recognized element of Yiddish culture, which makes it a fitting tool for YIVO. The audience for a quiz goes beyond the serious scholar of Eastern European Jewish language and culture to anyone who enjoys tongue-in-cheek Jewish humor, from Andy Samberg to the Marx Brothers.

In the last year, five quizzes have appeared on the website and been shared via Facebook and Twitter. They cover the following topics: Yiddish curses, Yiddish idiots, Ashkenazi folklore (a tie-in to an online course on the subject), Yiddish romance (can you identify a Yiddish pickup line when you hear one? It’s harder than you think, but if you get enough right, you can win a pickup line mug!), and most recently Yiddish theater. Each quiz consists of five to ten multiple-choice questions, such as “What custom did the Jews observe on Christmas and why?” or “which of these Yiddish words means a fool made of clay?” Though the questions are often in transliterated Yiddish, the multiple-choice format allows for guessing, and the options are humorous: some possible answers on the romance quiz include “It must be illegal to look as good as you” and “You’re as beautiful as a cat in sour cream.”

To score the quiz, the visitor enters an email address, and at the same time can check a box agreeing to receive regular mailings from YIVO. Typical of Buzzfeed-style personality and trivia quizzes, the YIVO page then offers buttons to share one’s results on Facebook or Twitter. Quizzes like these are a natural fit for a social media site like Facebook, where sharing trivia, game scores and quiz results and comparing with friends is already a habit.

In this way a quiz both engages the first user it’s sent to, and encourages them to pass that engagement on to others, as part of a fun and lightly competitive social interaction. As a form of cultural heritage outreach, YIVO’s quiz project capitalizes gracefully on the urge we all have to show off our talent for remembering movie lines or Disney princess gowns, or even different words for “idiot.”

Can you pass a Yiddish Quiz? Try one for yourself!

https://www.yivo.org/Yiddish-Quizzes

by Teresa M. Meléndez

           

The Museum of Contemporary Art of Puerto Rico (MAC), located in Santurce, one of the neighborhoods that make up San Juan, the island’s capital, organizes many events and projects that engage the Santurce community. One of them is El MAC en el Barrio, which, according to the MAC website, is an artistic program for action and social integration. The project was first brought to life in 2014, and has been done yearly since. Activities such as this offer communities the opportunity to engage with art, culture and each other in a creative environment. According to their website, their community outreach programs give the space and the tools for citizens to help them  become more aware of their environment, strengthen their formative capacity and enrich their cultural and spiritual base. They’ve managed to power their outreach projects thanks to alliances with community and environmental protection organizations, and educational and artistic institutions.

El MAC en el Barrio is held during the summer, and is open to the public. After hurricanes Irma and María ravaged the island in September 2017, the MAC implemented an Emergency Creative and Educational Program (Programa Educativo y Cultural de Emergencia) directed at people affected by the storms. Part of this program was a special edition of El MAC en el Barrio, That edition had three main components: a School Program (Programa Escolar), which is geared towards 70 students between the ages of 4 and 16; a Creative Psychosocial Support Program (Programa Creativo de Apoyo Psicosocial) for families and the elderly; and lastly, artistic and cultural activities for the enjoyment of the general public.

The educational program ran from October 4 to October 21 2017, and was held at the museum. It was directed towards kids from poor nearby neighborhoods. It integrated the arts into the more traditional curriculum to keep the learning going while the schools were still closed. The Creative Psychosocial Support Program is being offered directly in various elderly people homes in communities in Santurce and Río Piedras, as well as Guaynabo and Cataño. Various known artists and educators participate as facilitators of these programs. The main goal of these efforts is to give community members concrete and direct help, as well as give them artistic outlets to help cope with the difficult situations that so many people faced (and are still facing) post-María. The final component of the initiative is offering cultural activities open to all. So far they’ve held two events, ¡Luz Verde a la Cultura! (Green Light for the Culture!), and a stage play titled Hij@s de la Bernarda (Children of Bernarda), which was penned and directed by playwright and educator Rosa Luisa Márquez, and had choreography by Jeanne d’Arc Casas and the dancers, as well as live music.

Previous editions of El MAC en el Barrio usually includes the presentation of projects commissioned by the museum. Previous projects include a “community sound ethnography” by artist Migdalia Luz Barens, who went to different Santurce communities and gathered stories from residents, and then mixed those recordings with recordings of local singers, and with passersby who agreed to be part of the sound experiment. Another project was commissioned from artist  José Luis Vargas, who collaborated with participants and the directors of La Fondita de Jesús (an organization dedicated to serving the homeless community by giving them jobs as well as shelter). El MAC en el Barrio also has educational activities for schools, as well as walking or bike tours of different communities, and they offer various talks and forums about the communities that participated in the commissioned projects, and the artistic process.

The museum’s focus on community outreach has turned it into a cultural hub for both the people you would expect to be fans of contemporary art, as well as members of the tight knit Santurce community, who’ve been around since the creation of the neighborhood. Their commitment to artists, and their efforts to help them keep working and getting compensated for their work, even during the hard times the whole island faced after the hurricane is very commendable. This year’s edition of El MAC en el Barrio is currently in the works, and from the call for artists, it seems to be focused towards more community engagement and aid, not just in Santurce, but also in other towns. They’re looking to go to the barrios that still need help.

There is currently a fundraiser going for the El MAC en el Barrio program, which you can help here.

by Natalie Kelsey

Some of my earliest cultural heritage-related memories are of the Munson Williams Proctor Arts Institute in Utica, NY. My father, an artist himself, brought me there as often as I wanted. The first piece I remember is also the first piece you can see upon entering the museum, Jackson Pollock’s Number 2, 1949. I remember first running up to the painting, looking closely at the expressive lines, then standing back to notice the abstract figures that, to me, appeared to be dancing across the canvas. Upstairs, I was further taken by another of MWPAI’s permanent installations – The Voyage of Life, a series of paintings by Thomas Cole. The paintings’ detailed landscapes left me in awe. Although I have chosen to pursue a career in the historical portion of cultural heritage, this particular museum remains close to my heart. For this reason, I decided to catch up with the museum in this profile of the museum’s social media presence on Twitter. MWPAI’s Twitter page appears to reach a relatively small number of people, with just over 2,000 followers. But the account is very active – posting at least two or three times a day.

Upon visiting MWPAI’s Twitter page, I noticed that the museum and its related art education program have grown a lot since I left the area in 2010. Founded in 1919, the museum is named for its founding families, who built the foundation of the museum’s collections. The museum building itself is a work of art, designed by world famous architect Philip Johnson. MWPAI has three main divisions. The Museum of Art is the main portion of MWPAI, boasting several permanent exhibitions as well as gallery space for new artists. The Performing Arts Division presents musical performances, plays, cinema, family programs, and concerts. Finally, the School of Art offers an accredited college program as well as community arts programs for adults, teens, and kids.

In 1999, MWPAI partnered with the Pratt Institute of Art and Design to offer this higher education program. This partnership is ongoing, but in 2013, MWPAI began its first Artist in Residence program. This program features heavily on the Twitter page, which showcases residency openings, resident artists’ works, and residents’ exhibitions. Also featured on the page are practical information, like changes to the museum’s normal hours, and advertising for the museum’s many community education classes. These classes include lessons in figure drawing, sculpting, jewelry-making, and animation. The page links out to the registration for these classes. Also linked are job postings and news stories, like this one, where the museum’s newest curator discusses the importance of placing art in historical context. Although there are many of these posts, they garner few responses from users.

MWPAI’s Twitter page also includes information about events at the museum, of which there are many! There’s a First Friday Happy Hour, musical performances, a film series, and many seasonal and holiday-related programs. These are where users interact most with the page. In a post where patrons were encouraged to place heart-shaped sticky-notes next to their favorite works of art for Valentine’s Day, several users commented, excited to see their notes on the Twitter page. Another very popular program is “Museum Match,” where a selected portrait is posted on social media and patrons are encouraged to come to the museum wearing matching clothing and pose for pictures with the portrait. The museum posts some of these, and others who can’t make it to the museum post their own “Museum Match” pictures from wherever they are.

The Twitter page also serves as a place where the different departments of MWPAI can interact with each other publicly. These interactions are mainly used to promote the museum’s events, but also to show museum patrons the intricate workings of the museum. Because MWPAI has grown so much and undertakes so many projects, it’s helpful and interesting to see the way the different departments interact with each other on social media.

Although it has been many years since I’ve visited Munson Williams Proctor Arts Institute in person, I feel that the Twitter page gave me a good understanding of its many current projects. The museum has grown and changed, but I can see that its goals and values remain the same as when I first ran up to Pollock’s Number 2, 1949.

by Jennifer Skarbek

The John F. Kennedy Presidential Library houses over 400 collections surrounding the Kennedy administration from 1961-1963.  While there are a large number of collections of governmental records, there are several lesser known collections of correspondence from the general public that were sent to the White House.  These letters ranged anywhere from criticisms of President Kennedy’s policy to wishing the Kennedy family members happy birthday, but one particularly large and prominent collection of correspondence is the John F. Kennedy Condolence Mail collection.

The Papers of John F. Kennedy, Condolence Mail collection, typically shortened to simply Condolence Mail, consists of the letters and gifts that were sent to Mrs. Kennedy after the assassination of her husband in November 1963.  As noted in the vast majority of the letters in this collection, President Kennedy left a great impact on the United States, moving thousands of people to write in with their condolences.  With so many people compelled to write to the White House regarding an event that only took place 50 years ago, the Kennedy Library naturally gravitated to this collection as a way to engage the current public in the archives, especially in a way that allows the public to see themselves in the archives.

Unfortunately, there were a few roadblocks to present this collection as it was.  First, the collection itself was not in any condition to be easily searched by the general public.  Not only were there massive amounts of materials in no real order, there also wasn’t a finding aid to help sort through the massive amounts of letters.  This leaves archivists at a loss when a researcher is interested in seeing their letter, or the letter from a loved one, that theoretically should be found in this collection.  Frustrated with the lack of organization which made any particular letter nearly impossible to find, the archives and reference team at the Kennedy Library recognized that the collection would need to be properly processed and organized if they’re going to utilize the collection as a way to make connections with the general public.

In addition to the constraints on the arrangement and description of the collection, the collection itself was “sampled” in the 1970s, meaning that the archivists chose to only keep approximately 10% of the originally over 1,500 linear foot collection.  Since the collection was so large, and presumably a bit overwhelming, the proposed solution was to save only a few letters that were found to be representative of the many. Unfortunately, the Kennedy Library is now dealing with the ramifications of the decisions of the previous archivists, and aren’t necessarily able to help everyone find their condolence letters they mailed to the Kennedy’s in 1963.

While the Kennedy Library can’t rectify the decisions of the past, they are able to address the organizational concerns from an archival perspective.  Every semester, the Kennedy Library hosts an archives wide “Preservation Week” to alphabetize the letters in the collection with the help of both internal and external volunteers.  Next, these volunteers proceeded with processing the collection by foldering and boxing the letters, ensuring the letters will be preserved and are more accessible. This project has been ongoing for several years, but Spring 2018 Preservation Week finally concluded the long awaited alphabetizing and processing project!

The processing archivists are now hard at work updating the finding aid with the newly processing information, with the hopes of making it available for researchers to utilize in finding their own letters.  While there are a large number of letters that were unfortunately not preserved, there are still almost 200 cubic feet of condolence mail that is now usable by any interested researchers, and are much easier to locate than they have been in close to 50 years.

The next steps for the Kennedy Library are accessibility and publicity of this collection.  The finding aid is key to being able to present the collection to the public. Once a finding aid is available, the Library will be able to make connections between the public and a collection that may contain their original correspondence with the White House from an event that stood out to many in their personal history.  This creates a unique outreach opportunity to show that the a government archives does include the people, even if those collections aren’t traditionally in the spotlight, all while breaking down any lingering “gatekeeping” attitudes surrounding archival repositories.

by Michelle Slater

The British Museum is a world renowned institution known for its rich history of collecting antiquities and priceless works of art from around the world. The Museum is open year-round for free to visitors in London, but recognizes that visiting in person is limiting to the many more people they wish to reach. While they are known for their strict access and photography policy upon visiting the museum, they do make many efforts to share their collections digitally, through controlled marketing and outreach programs. The British Museum has made it a part of their mission to reach more of the general public, and has implemented several new outreach projects using digital and virtual programming.

One way the Museum is bringing light to its collections and internal practices is through “Curator’s Corner,” a youtube series hosted on the British Museum’s youtube channel. Each episode is an intimate encounter with an exceptional or bizarre selection from the Museum’s collection. The series is designed to peak interest on niche objects and topics, focusing on particularly interesting or rare objects in the Museum’s collection, and items that may not be on display as they undergo restoration.

The “Curator’s Corner” series highlights the different departments and staff who care for and interact with the collections on a daily basis, creating transparency around the many studies and ongoing practices at the British Museum being conducted behind closed doors. Every episode is guided by speaker whose occupation varies from topic to topic, and runs the gamete of museum professionals including subject specialists, department curators, scientists, researchers, and more. The episode’s host often reports directly from their office, the gallery floor, the archive stacks, or scientific labs to show the wide range of work being done throughout the Museum, and to give viewers a look inside their workspaces- a site that the average visitor would never see.

Each episode runs between five to ten minutes, and there is a total of twenty-five episodes in the series to date, spanning three seasons. Topics range from ‘the effects of light on works of art’ to ‘depictions of ancient demons.’ “Curator’s Corner” draws in viewers with topics so varied that it is impossible to gloss them over. Items from the Museum’s collection are discussed in-depth using plain language, so that the average viewer can relate to and understand the themes discussed.

The “Curator’s Corner” video series is shared across the Museum’s social media accounts and blog. While every blog post includes an episode of “Curator’s Corner” linked from youtube, not every episode has a coinciding blog post- which tend to be more illustrative with multiple pictures and blocks of scholarly text about the featured topic. In this way, the blog is a further resource for select topics covered in “Curator’s Corner.” With over 81k subscribers on youtube, episodes range in views from week to week, some reaching upwards of 112k views. As the series progresses, “Curator’s Corner” is able to reach a wider, disparate group of viewers with engaging and unique programming, elevating the public interest and knowledge in the collections held by the British Museum.

 

 

by Thera Webb

The Digital Prison Archive is an outreach project for the Prison Public Memory Project, an organization that currently focuses on collecting and archiving stories and experiences from people connected to the three prisons in Hudson New York – the House of Refuge for Women (1887-1904), the NY State Training School for Girls (1904-1975), and the Hudson Correctional Facility (1976-present). As stated on their website the “Project works with individuals and organizations in communities with prisons across the United States to recover, preserve, interpret, present, and honor the memories of what took place in those institutions,” and in doing so they engage with people who were incarcerated and people who worked at the prisons, as well as community members.

The Prison Public Memory Project has a number of outreach projects – including very active Facebook and Instagram pages. You can listen to oral histories of prison employees and people who were incarcerated at the prisons, on their SoundCloud or on their website. They occasionally hold pop-up museums at community events, as well as hosting speakers, all of which can been seen on their YouTube channel as well as their website.

The Digital Prison Archive is currently housed on Flickr, which makes the content searchable and easily available to the average researcher or user. This means that, while the Prison Public Memory Project is in the process of moving into their renovated physical space – which they acquired in 2015 – some of their files are fully accessible to the public.

Rather than hosting the entire collection of records online, the Digital Prison Archive has digitized one box, as sort of a taster for the collection. Since the archive is not affiliated with any institutions or libraries, this is a good way to introduce the public to what their records hold. The digitized records are all related to the NY State Training School for Girls and were created in the 1920s. These records range from photographs and letters, to the intake histories of young women who were incarcerated there.

Having these stories online both and supplemented with scans of primary sources that you can zoom in on and read, adds an extra dimension to the experiences of these women. Not only can you read about their experiences being incarcerated, and listen to oral histories from some of the women, but you can also delve into their experiences exactly as written when they were in the State Training School for Girls.

Being able to access images of the original documents involves readers on a deeper level, as well as drawing more attention to the main page of the Prison Public Memory Project by directing viewers who would like to learn more to browse the site.

by Caroline Tanski

On May 1^st, 1718, the Mission San Antonio de Valero (which would come to be known as the Alamo) was founded, and along with it the city of San Antonio, Texas. While activities will culminate in the first week of May, 2018, San Antonio is celebrating its tercentenary for the duration of the year with exhibits, events, and community service projects. One of these celebrations comes from the Special Collections and Archives of the University of Texas, San Antonio. It’s called La Puerta, and it’s an online exhibit that displays the sense of community, the humor, and the good food that make San Antonio a city unlike any other.

Comprising twelve categories, the photos represented in La Puerta were pulled from UTSA Special Collections as well as the archives of local newspapers. With well over three million photographs, the Special Collections photograph collection is one of the most popular resources in the archives. When initial conversations about the tercentenary began, says Kristin Law, the UTSA archivist who helped to conceive and execute La Puerta along with a team that included a digital archivist, a designer, and a communications professional, the idea was for a “portal to San Antonio history.” It quickly became clear that the most effective resource at their disposal was the wealth of photographs in the university’s collections. Dating back to the 1860s—long before the university’s founding in 1969—the photographs documented areas of life including activism, culinary traditions, the rodeo, and “stunts and critters,” all of which became categories in the final exhibit.

At the same time that exhibit planning began, UTSA got a new president, Thomas Taylor Eighmy. Katie Rojas, the manuscripts archivist for UTSA Special Collections, says that Eighmy has been “gunning for connecting to the community,” which has encouraged the university at all levels to optimize opportunities to reach out to the public. Special Collections prioritizes collecting materials that relate to the culture of San Antonio and South Texas: African-American and LGBTQ communities in the region, the history of women and gender, Mexican-American activism, and Tex-Mex food, among others. La Puerta was a timely way to tie the university’s history and holdings to the vibrant history of the city and generations of its occupants.

Law says that the exhibit was designed with minimalist text, partly due to time constraints—after the first conversations in June, the exhibit went live in February, 2018. In those eight months the photographs had to be scanned, metadata had to be created for them, and the website had to be built (the designer was able to customize a WordPress template, which saved a lot of time and effort). Each category in the exhibit has two or three sentences summarizing the grouping. Each photograph is labeled with a title, a call number, and the name of the collection from which it came. Without bulky text blocks, the viewer can scroll through the galleries and get lost in imagining the action, the life, in the vivid scenes captured.

When asked how she selected which photographs to include, Law says that she wanted to “stick with the themes but show people what they haven’t seen, what I would want to show to my friends and family.” Law recognizes that many of the photographs in the library’s holdings came from newspaper archives, which historically featured white residents and did not represent the true diversity of the population. Law and the other creators of La Puerta sought to find diverse people, activities, and lifestyles in the archives so that everyone who looked at the exhibit would be able to find something to which they could relate.

The exhibit, like the Special Collections and Archives, is intended for everyone. Rojas says that UTSA Special Collections serves “students and faculty as well as researchers from the community and, well, anywhere.” As the collecting priorities indicate, Special Collections is making a concerted effort to address gaps in its collections and to fully represent the wealth of variety of San Antonio life. With an enthusiastic university leader, Special Collections is continuing its normal outreach (including pop-up exhibits and zine fairs, which connected archivists and librarians to new people, some of whom had never heard of special collections) and pursuing opportunities such as La Puerta. Whether it’s in familiar faces, activities, streets they may drive down, or festivals they attend, Law says of La Puerta, “I hope the folks who see this get to see themselves in it, somehow. I just hope they get to see themselves.”

by Rebecca Sasseville

There’s no avoiding the power of social media for a cultural heritage institution. It’s free and easy to use for accounts and followers alike. Social media is used by all walks a life, everywhere in the world. Any person who has an internet connection is a potential follow of an institution’s social media account. Facebook has approximately two billion users. Instagram, Tumblr, and Twitter accounts number in the hundreds of millions. Sharing online is embedded in today’s culture.

Archives Hashtag Party (AHP) started in the summer of 2017 by the National Archives Records Administration (NARA). Their press release asks archives to, “Come hang out on social media and share highlights from your collections around a different theme each month. We want to mingle with archives from all over and learn about the treasures you hold.” David S. Ferriero, the Archivist of the United States, wrote in his blog that, while the hashtags are entertaining “it also show[s] the relevance of archives.” AHP asks all to participate if they can, not just archives, but libraries, museums and all cultural institutions around the world. NARA posts the theme about a week before the first Friday of the following month. In the past eight months over 500 institutions have participated!

I run a public library for a small town in Massachusetts and I have very little funding that can go towards outreach. Our business Facebook and Instagram accounts are free and it’s so simple I can have my high school volunteers make a post for us on the fly. Due to the bundling of posts using the same hashtag, an AHP post by my little library will be seen among posts from larger institutions, giving us enormous potential exposure worldwide. Institutions are working together to advocate for the field. The fact that partakers in AHP can include accounts ranging from the almighty NARA to my small library further shows how much power social media has.

The first hashtag was #ArchivesSquadGoals in August 2017. NARA’s blog explains it as, “a theme that celebrated friendship, style, and history.” By embracing a term like “squad goals” the parties are reaching a younger audience. So far, most of the themes have fit at least vaguely with a holiday that occurs during that month: January’s hashtag was #ArchivesResolutions and February’s was #ArchivesBlackHistory. September’s hashtag was #ArchivesCute, which doesn’t fit into a typical September celebration, but there’s never not a good time to see photos of kittens and babies!

#ArchivesAwesomeWomen was March 2018’s hashtag making use of Women’s History Month’s rise in popularity. Many cultural heritage institutions may have already queued up social media posts about women in their collections so adding this hashtag once it was announced would have made sharing content easier. NARA naturally joined in that March by sharing a photograph of astronaut Sally Ride on Instagram, writing that she ”was just 32 when she became the first American woman in space. 🚀✨ So yeah, we’re feeling pretty good about our lifetime accomplishments so far. 😬” National Archives uses emojis, everyone, can you believe it? How cool!

Down time on Air Force One during a trip to Oklahoma calls for a game of #TrivialPursuit! 06/05/1985 #PresidentReagan #ArchivesGameNight pic.twitter.com/Uxaa7Cbyer

— RonaldReaganLibrary (@Reagan_Library) October 12, 2017

In October 2017 the hashtag was #ArchivesGameNight. Ronald Reagan Presidential Library posted a photo on their Twitter of travelers on a flight to Oklahoma on Air Force One who are playing Trivial Pursuit to pass the time. The photo gives Reagan, a leader that many people on social media may not have even been alive for during his presidency, some personality and humanity and it’s fun to see the 80’s clothing and large eyeglasses of the women!

The power of photographs are undeniable. Archives are showcasing their collections and their personalities. Archives having fun with their posts by using hashtags, emojis and casual language invites new users to their social media accounts and therefore the institutions’ resources. Ferriero, wrote in his blog that, “One of our primary goals for this campaign is to boost the visibility of archives across the country.” Judging by the likes, reblogs, and retweets of the many of posts using the AHP hashtags it’s working.

Further reading:

https://www.archives.gov/campaigns/archives-hashtag-party

https://aotus.blogs.archives.gov/2017/08/25/join-us-for-an-archives-hashtag-party/