Citations to Publications

This page lists citations to my publications, drawn from Scopus, ResearchGate, Ebsco, and Google Scholar.  It excludes self-citations.

Citations to:

Saunders, L. (2015). Academic libraries’ strategic plans: top trends and under-recognized areas. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 41(3), 285-291.

  1. Harland, F., Stewart, G., & Bruce, C. (2018). Leading the academic library in strategic engagement with stakeholders: A constructivist grounded theory.  College & Research Libraries, Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/117603/1/QUT%20repository%20version.pdf
  2. Akpan, B.B., & Akpan, B.S. (2018). Intellectual freedom and censorship. Journal of Advancements in Library Science.
  3. Bass, R. & Slowe, S. (2018). Supporting open access at Kent–New staff roles. Publications, 6(2), 17. doi:10.3390/publications6020017
  4. Cook, M. (in press). Virtual serendipity: Preserving embodied browsing in the 21st century research library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.09.003
  5. Chatzipanagiotou, N. (2017). Exploring information management practices: Academic library professionals’ experiences. Association for Information Systems: Selected Papers of the IRIS. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=iris2017
  6. Vardakosta, I., & Kapidakis, S. (2017). Policies, open access, and cooperation as factors influencing geospatial collections in libraries and institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship.
  7. Harland, F., Stewart, G., Bruce, C. (2017). Ensuring the academic library’s relevance to stakeholders: The role of the library director. The Journal of Academic Librarianship.
  8. Asante, E. K. (2017). Competitive strategies of microfinance owners in Ghana (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Scholarworks: http://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4757&context=dissertations
  9. Martin, C., Cadiou, C., Jannes-Ober, E. (2017). Data management: New tools, new organization, and new skills in a French research institute. LIBER Quarterly, 27(1), 73-88. doi: http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10196
  10. Dallis, D. (2017). Perspectives on library public services from four leaders. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(2), 205-216.
  11. Brunner, M, & Osorio, J. (2017). Recruitment, retention, diversity, and professional development. In T. Gilman (Ed.), Academic Librarianship Today (pp. 143-160). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
  12. Faires, D. (2017). Serving campus and remote students and faculty: Online learning, distance education, and MOOCs. In T. Gilman (Ed.), Academic Librarianship Today (pp. 171-196). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
  13. Kasemap, K. (2017). Mastering knowledge management in academic libraries. In B. Gunjal (Ed.), Managing Knowledge and Scholarly Assets in Academic Libraries (pp. 27-55). Hershey, PA: IGI Global
  14. Yong, Z., Hui, Y., Zhong-xue, Z., Zheng-liang, T., & Qing-li, B. (2016). Research on the strategic plan analysis and reference of abroad university: Taking New Zealand university libraries as an example. Library Theory and Practice, 11, 98-103.
  15. Attebury, R.I. (2016). Professional development of academic librarians: A phenomenological study of meaningful and transformational experiences (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (10240886).
  16. Hannan, H.G. (2016). Great expectations: (Re)design motivator for merging traffic at the service desk. In S.S. Hines & K.M. Crowe (Eds.), The Future of Library Space (pp. 199-216). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing
  17. Pierard, C., Shoup, J., Clement, S.K., Emmons, M., Neely, T.Y., & Wilkinson, F.C. (2016). Building back better libraries: Improving planning amidst disasters. In S.S. Hines & K.M. Crowe (Eds.), The Future of Library Space (pp. 307-334). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing
  18. Corrall, S. (2016). Library space assessment: A review and professional case study. Proceedings of 11th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services.
  19. Sheehan, B., & Hogenboom, K. (2016). Assessing a patron-driven library-funded data purchase program. The Journal of Academic Librarianship (in press; available online 22 Oct. 2016).
  20. Mahwasane, N.P. (2016). Conceptualizing the importance of libraries in student academic performance: A brief Review. The Journal of Social Science, 48(3), 259-266.
  21. Dold, C.J. (2016). Rethinking mobile learning in light of current theories and studies. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2016.08.004
  22. Fallin, L. (2016). Beyond books: The concept of the academic library as learning space. New Library World, 117(5/6), 30-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/NLW-10-2015-0079
  23. Russell, C.L. (2016). Service-disabled veteran small business owners’ success strategies (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Scholarworks.
  24. Klain-Gabbay, L., & Shoham, S. (2016). Scholarly communication and academic librarians. Library and Information Science Research. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2016.04.004
  25. Johnson, Q. (2016). Moving from analysis to assessment: Strategic assessment of library collections. The Journal of Library Administration, 56(4), 488-498. doi: 1080/01930826.2016.1157425
  26. Petrides, L., Goger, L., & Jimes, C. (2016). The role of “open” in library strategic planning.Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(36). doi: 10.14507/epaa.24.2478
  27. Grynoch, T. (2016). Implementing research data management services in a Canadian context. Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management, 12. doi:10.5931/djim.v12.i1.6458
  28. Wynne, B., Dixon, S., & Donohue, N. (2016). The changing library brand: A case study.New Review of Academic Librarianship, doi: 1080/13614533.2016.1156000
  29. Drivas, I.C., Sakas, D.P., & Giannakopolous, G.A. (2016). Self-other agreement for improving communication in libraries and information services.Library Review, 65(3).
  30. McGrath, M. (2015). Interlending and document supply: A review of the recent literature: 90.Interlending and Document Supply, 43(3), 160-166.

 

Saunders, L., Kurbanoglu, S., Wilkins Jordan, M., Boustany, J., Chawner, B., Filas, M., & … Zivkovic, D. (2013). Culture and competencies: A multi-country examination of reference service competencies. Libri: International Journal of Libraries & Information Services, 63(1), 33-46. doi:10.1515/libri-2013-0003

  1. Kang, Q. (2016). Outreach programs for graduates in top academic libraries in China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 557-568.
  2. Kulbin, J., & Virkus, S. (2015). Knowledge, skills and attitudes of librarians in developing users’ information literacy. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 552, 549-557.
  3. Moniz, R., & Slutzky, H. (2015). Mindful reference service. In R. Moniz, J. Eshleman, J. Henry, H. Slutzky, & L. Moniz (Eds.), The Mindful Librarian: Connecting the Practice of Mindfulness to Librarianship, pp. 111-136. Waltham, MA: Chandos.
  4. Smith, B.J. (2015). The case for international collaboration in academic library management, human resources, and staff development.IFLA Journal, 41(2), 140-152. doi:10.1177/0340035215580140
  5. Bronstein, J. (2015). An exploration of the library and information science professional skills and personal competencies: An Israeli perspective. Library and Information Science Research, 37(2), 130-138. doi:63 · DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2015.02.003

 

Saunders, L., & Wilkins Jordan, M. (2013). Significantly different? Reference service competencies in public and academic libraries. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 52(3), 216-224.

  1. Dickinson, G. K., Kimmel, S.C., & Doll, C.A. (2015). Common core and the common good: Educational standards and the future of libraries.The Library Quarterly, 85(3), 225-243. doi: 1086/681609
  2. Hoppenfeld, J., & Malafi, E. (2015). Engaging with entrepreneurs in academic and public libraries.Reference Services Review, 43(3), 379-399. doi: 1108/RSR-02-2015-0011
  3. Hallam, G., & Ellard, R. (2015). Our future, our skills: Using evidence to drive practice in public libraries. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(4), 113-131.
  4. Wilkins Jordan, M. (2014). Reference desks in public libraries: What happens and what to know.The Reference Librarian, 55(3), 196-211. doi:10.1080/02763877.2014.910742

Saunders, L. (2013). Culture and collaboration: Fostering integration of information literacy by speaking the language of faculty. In Mueller, D. M. (Ed.). Imagine, Innovate, Inspire: The Proceedings of the ACRL 2013 Conference, Indianapolis, IN: ACRL.

  1. Cohen, M.E. (2015). The flipped classroom as a tool for engaging discipline faculty in collaboration: A case study in library-business collaboration.New Review of Academic Librarianship. doi: 1080/13614533.2015.107316

Saunders, L. (2013). Learning from our mistakes: Reflections on customer service and how to improve it at the reference desk. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 20(2), 144-155.

  1. Allen, E.G. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on student-centeredness in an academic library. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 23(2), 111-129.
  2. Rabina, D., & Peet, L. (2014). Meeting a composite of user needs amidst change and controversy: The case of the New York Public Library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 54(2), 52-59.
  3. Ewing, R.L. (2015). My journey from certified bra fitter to reference librarian. In D. Lowe-Wincentsen (Ed.), Skills to Make a Librarian: Transferable Skills Inside and Outside the Library (pp.105-115). Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing.

Saunders, L. (2012). Faculty perspectives on information literacy as a student learning outcome. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(4), 226-236. 

  1. Parsazadeh, N., Ali, R., & Rezaei, M. (2018). A framework for cooperative and interactive mobile learning to improve online information evaluation skills. Computers & Education, 120, 75-89.
  2. Lockhart, J. (2017). Moving information literacy further by looking at retention, skills transfer and assessment. Proceedings of the IATUL Conference. Paper 2.
  3. Dawes, L. (2017). Faculty perceptions of teaching information literacy to first-year students: A phenomenographic study. The Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. doi: 10.1177/0961000617726129
  4. Yevelson-Shorsher, A., & Bronstein, J. (2017). Three perspectives on information literacy in academia: Talking to librarians, faculty, and students. College & Research Libraries,
  5. Bohannon, J.L., Arnett, E.J., & Greer, E. (2017). Learning information literacy across the curriculum (LILAC) and its impact on student digital literacies and learning across the humanities. Professional Communications Conference, IEEE International, Madison, WI. New York, NY: IEEE.
  6. Kaletski, G. (2017). Faculty perceptions of the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Endnotes, 8(1), 26-35.
  7. Alves, A.P.M. (2017). Competencia informacionale o uso etico da informacao na producao cientifica: o papel do bibliotecario na producao intelectual no ambiente academico (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/10481/44170/6/26135097.pdf
  8. Petermanec, Z., & Šebjan, U. (2017). Evaluation components of information literacy in undergraduate students in Slovenia: An experimental study. Library and Information Science Research, 39(1), 69-75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.01.009
  9. Ellis, C., Johnson, F., & Rowley, J. (2017). Promoting information literacy: Perspectives from UK universities. Library Hi Tech, 35(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LHT-10-2016-0118
  10. Smith, J.D. (2016). An examination of information literacy: A survey of community college faculty (Doctoral dissertation). Paper 285. Retrieved from http://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1288&context=education_etd
  11. Fullard, A. (2016). Using the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy to foster teaching and learning partnerships. South African Journal of Library and Information Science, 82(2). Retrieved from http://sajlis.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/1627
  12. Perry, H.B. (2016). Information literacy in the sciences: Faculty perception of undergraduate student skill. College & Research Libraries.
  13. White, A.C. (2016). From the outside looking in: Lessons learned about library instruction from working as a composition instructor. Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice, 4(2), 66-72. doi: 10.5195/palrap.2016.118
  14. Norgaard, R., & Sinkinson, C. (2016). Writing information literacy: A retrospective and a look ahead. In D’Angelo, B.J., Jameison, S., Maid, B., & Walker, J.R. (Eds.), Information literacy: Research and collaboration across disciplines (pp. 15-37). Fort Collins, Colorado: WAC Clearinghouse and University Press of Colorado.
  15. Kissel, F., Winniger, M.R., Weeden, S.R., Wittberg, P.A., Halverson, R.S., Lacy, M., & Huisman, R.K. (2016). Bridging the gaps: Collaboration in a faculty and librarian community of practice on information literacy. In D’Angelo, B.J., Jameison, S., Maid, B., & Walker, J.R. (Eds.), Information literacy: Research and collaboration across disciplines (pp. 427-455). Fort Collins, Colorado: WAC Clearinghouse and University Press of Colorado.
  16. Brown, S., & Walker, J. (2016). Information literacy preparation of pre-service and graduate educators. In D’Angelo, B.J., Jameison, S., Maid, B., & Walker, J.R. (Eds.), Information literacy: Research and collaboration across disciplines (pp. 283-297). Fort Collins, Colorado: WAC Clearinghouse and University Press of Colorado.
  17. Sandercock, P. (2016). Instructor perceptions of student information literacy: Comparing international IL models to reality. The Journal of Information Literacy, 10(1), 3-29.
  18. Hanbidge, A.S., Sanderson, N., Tin, T. (2016). Information literacy on the go! Adding mobile to an age old challenge. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile Learning, pp. 103-107. Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal.
  19. Ackerman, E., & Arbour, B.K. (2016). “I have ten peer-reviewed articles, now what?” How political science research methods textbooks teach students about scholarly context. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, (in press).
  20. McGowan, B., Gonzales, M., & Stanny, C.J. (2016). What do undergraduate course syllabi say about information literacy? portal: Libraries and the Academy, 16(3), 599-617.
  21. Bury, S. (2016). Learning from faculty voices on information literacy: Opportunities and challenges for undergraduate information literacy education. Reference Services Review, 44(3).
  22. Kavšek, T., Peklaj, C., Žugelj, U. (2016). Information literacy training evaluation: The case of first year psychology students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.008
  23. Grimal, A. Dubois-Brissonet, F., & Dumoulin, E. (2015). Information literacy training in AgroParisTech food studies. International Journal of Food Studies, 4, 126-133.
  24. Jabeen, M., Yun, L., Rafique, M., Jabeen, M., & Tahir, M. A. (2016). Information literacy in academic and research libraries of Beijing, China: Practices, methods, and problems. Information Development, 32(3), 579-591.
  25. Goldenstein, C., & Kearley, J. (2013). Faculty perceptions of library instruction. In I. Hall, S. Thornton, & S. Town (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th Northumbria Conference on Performance Measurement in Library and Information Services (pp.113-120). York, UK.
  26. Noe, N. W. (2013). Creating and maintaining an information literacy instruction program in the twenty-first century: An ever-changing landscape. Cambridge, MA: Chandos
  27. Castillo de Leon, M.A., & Hinojosa, L.M.M. (2016).  Evaluación de las competencias en información y su relación con variables académicas en estudiantes de universidades mexicanas. Actualidades Investigativas en Educacion, 16(2). doi:10.15517/aie.v16i2.23563
  28. Pinto, M. (2106). Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies. Asian Journal of Information Management, 68(2). doi: 10.1108/AJIM-05-2015-0079
  29. Eckardt, L., & Robra-Brissantz, S. (2016). Lost in Antarctica: Designing and information literacy game to support motivation and learning success. In J. Parsons, T. Tuunanen, J. Venable, B. Donnellan, M. Helfert, & J. Kenneally (Eds.), Tackling Society’s Grand Challenges with Design Science, 11th International Conference DESRIST Proceedings. St John’s NL, Canada.
  30. Simons, A.C. (2016). Librarians, faculty, and the writing center partnering to build an interdisciplinary course: A case study at the University of Houston, USA. The New Review of Academic Librarianship, doi: 10.1080/13614533.2016.1185020
  31. Leeder, C., & Shah, C. (2016). Practicing critical evaluation of online sources improves student search behavior. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, doi:1016/j.acalib.2016.04.001
  32. Pinto, M. (2016). Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies.Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(2), 227-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-05-2015-0079
  33. Haigh, A.E., Kinsella, C.J. (2016). Bring in the librarians: Rethinking collaboration for political science research projects. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 35(1), 19-31. doi:1080/01639269.2016.1128300
  34. Lockhart, J. (2015). Measuring the application of information literacy skills after completion of a certificate in information literacy. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 81(2), 19-25. doi:7553/81-2-1567
  35. Ullah, M., Ameen, K. (2015). Perceptions of medical librarians towards the importance of information literacy skills.Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries, 16, 1-7. http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/pjlis/pdf/1st%20Paper%20-%20%20Vol.%2016%20(2015)%20-%20Dr.%20Midrar%20Ullah.pdf
  36. Wheeler, E., McKinney, P. (2015). Are librarians teachers? Investigating academic librarians’ perceptions of their own teaching roles.Journal of Information Literacy, 9(2), 111-128. doi: 11645/9.2.1985
  37. Overn, K.M. (2014). Faculty-librarian collaboration: Two pedagogical approaches.Journal of Information Literacy, 8(2): 36-55. doi: 11645/8.2.1910
  38. Walsh, A. (2015). Playful information literacy: Play and information literacy in higher education.Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 7(1), 80-94. doi: 15845/noril.v7i1.223
  39. Ramona, L., & Bran, C. (2014). The assessment of learning outcomes. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 163. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.297
  40. Pečiuliauskienė, P., &Damauskienė, L. (2014). The information literacy of the students studying mathematics and computer science programs at university. Pedagogika, 115(3): 39-51. doi: 15823/p.2014.026
  41. Parasazadeh, N., Ali,R., & Saeed, I.I.R. (2015). Digital information evaluation skills in higher education.Jurnal Teknologi 75(11). 91-99.
  42. Margolin, S., & Hayden, W. (2015). Beyond mechanics: Reframing the pedagogy and development of information literacy teaching tools.The Journal of Academic Librarianship 38(4): 226-236.
  43. Leeder, C.A. (2014).Scaffolding Students’ Information Literacy Skills with an Online Credibility Evaluation Learning Tool. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan.
  44. Singh, D., & Joshi, M. K.. (2014). Information evaluations skills among university students.SRELS Journal of Information Management, 51(5),.
  45. Dubicki, E. (2013). Faculty perceptions of students’ information literacy skills competencies.Journal of Information Literacy, 7(2), 97-125. DOI: 10.11645/7.2.1852
  46. Pochet, B., Lepoivre, P., & Thirion, P. (2013). Scholarly publication and education in information literacy within the bioengineering curriculum, the Gembloux Agro-bio Tech (ULg) case: A review.Biotechnologie Agronomie Societe Et Environnement, 17(1), 118-130.
  47. Natt, A. (2013). What is business information literacy and can the corporate librarian contribute anything to the discourse?Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 18(2), 146-174. DOI: 10.1080/08963568.2013.769290
  48. McCreadie, N. (2013). Library value in a developing world.IFLA Journal, 39(4), 328-343.
  49. Connaway, L. S., Lanclos, D., & Hood, E. (2013). “I find Google a lot easier than going to the library website.” Imagine ways to innovate and inspire students to use the academic library. In D. Mueller (Ed.)A Declaration of Interdependence: The Proceedings of the ACRL 2011 Conference, Philadelphia, PA: ACRL.
  50. Al-Issa, R. (2013). Concepts of information literacy and information literacy standards among undergraduate students in public and private universities in the state of Kuwait. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh). Retrieved from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/20264/
  51. Lwoga, E. T. (2013). Faculty perceptions and practices in health sciences information literacy instruction in Tanzania. Library Philosophy & Practice,
  52. Markey, K., Leeder, C., & Rieh, S. Y. (2013).Designing Information Literacy Games that Students Want to Play. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  53. Mertes, N. (2014). Teachers’ conceptions of student information literacy learning and teachers’ practices of information literacy teaching and collaboration with the school library(Doctoral dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philosophische Fakultät I).
  54. Salisbury, F. A., Karasmanis, S., Robertson, T., Corbin, J., Hulett, H., & Peseta, T. L. (2012). Transforming information literacy conversations to enhance student learning: new curriculum dialogues. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(3), 4.
  55. Stanger, K. (2012). Whose Hands Ply the Strands? Survey of Eastern Michigan University Psychology Faculty Regarding Faculty and Librarian Roles in Nurturing Psychology Information Literacy.Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 31(2), 112-127.
  56. Pretorius, L., Bailey, C., & Miles, M. (2013). Constructive alignment and the research skills development framework: Using theory to practically align graduate attributes, learning experiences, and assessment tasks in undergraduate midwifery.International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(3), 378-387.
  57. Rempel, J., & Cossarini, D. M. (2013). Communicating the relevance of the library in the age of Google: Improving undergraduate research skills and information literacy through new models of library instruction.Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 5(1), 49-53.
  58. Wakeling, W. (2013). The role of the university library/media center as an enabler of online learning. In R. M. Kesner (Ed.),The Online University: Building Viable Learning Experiences for Higher Education. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing.
  59. Zhao, J.C.Y., & Rabbat, M. (2013). Teaching information literacy skills to undergraduate engineering students. In the Proceedings of the 2013 Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference, Montreal, QC: CEEAC,  1-6. Retrieved from http://library.queensu.ca/ojs/index.php/PCEEA/article/view/4891
  60. Creaser, C., & Spezi, V. (2013). Improving perceptions of value to teaching and research staff: The next challenge for academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, DOI:1177/0961000613477678
  61. Jumonville, A. & Mitchell, E. (2014). The role of faculty autonomy in a course-integrated information literacy program. Reference Services Review, 42(4).
  62. Kousar, M., & Mahmood, K. (2015). Perceptions of faculty about information literacy skills of postgraduate engineering students. The International Information & Library Review, 47(1-2), 52-57. doi:10.1080/10572317.2015.1055694
  63. Uiphanit, T., Intraphoo, A., & Donavanik, J. (2012). Perspectives of students on fair use literacy under section 34 of the Thai Copyright Act B.E. 2537 (1994) in library and information science profession subject at department of library and information science, Suansunandha Rajabhat University. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 579-586.
  64. Jumonville, A. (2014). The humanities in process, not crisis: Information literacy as a means of low-stakes course innovation. College & Research Libraries News, 75(2), 84-87.
  65. Špiranec, S., Koltay, T., & Karvalics, L.Z. (2014). The shift of information literacy towards research 2.0. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(1), 87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.11.001
  66. Farrell, R., & Badke, W. (2015). Situating information literacy in the disciplines: A practical and systematic approach for academic librarians. Reference Services Review, 43(2), 319-340. doi: 10.1108/RSR-11-2014-0052
  67. Hanbidge, A.S., Sanderson, N., & Tin, T. (2015). Using mobile technology to enhance undergraduate student digital information literacy skills: A Canadian case study. The IAFOR Journal of Education Technologies, Special Edition, pp.108-121.

 

Saunders, L. (2012). Identifying core reference competencies from an Employer’s Perspective: Implications for instruction. College & Research Libraries, 73(4), 390-404.

  1. Kane, C., Meehlhause, K. , & Ryan, M. (2014). GTA= Great teaching adventure!Reference & User Services Quarterly, 54(1), 12-16.
  2. Bacalgini, B., & da Silva, M.T. (2014). Redefinition of the concept of service of academic libraries face to technological changes.Espacios, 36(12).
  3. Bronstein, J. (2015). An exploration of the library and information science professional skills and personal competencies: An Israeli perspective.Library and Information Science Research, 37(2), 130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2015.02.003
  4. Hicks, D. (2013). Information technology, change and information professionals’ identity construction: A discourse analysis.Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1). doi: 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101049
  5. Hicks, D. (2014). The construction of librarians’ professional identities: A discourse analysis.Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 38(4), 251-270. doi:10.1353/ils.2014.0017
  6. Robinson, K.P., Runcie, R., Manassi, T.M., McKoy-Johnson, F. (2015).  Establishing a competencies framework for a Caribbean academic library. Library Management, 36(1/2), 23-39. doi:1108/LM-10-2014-0123
  7. Chan, E. (2014). Analyzing Recorded Transactions to Extrapolate the Required Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities of Reference Desk Providers at an Urban, Academic/Public Library. Journal of Library Administration, 54(1), 23-32.
  8. Alvarez, M., França, I., Cuenca, A., Bastos, F., Ueno, H., Barros, C., & Guimarães, M. (2014). Information literacy: perceptions of Brazilian HIV/ AIDS researchers. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 31(1), 64-74.
  9. Todorinova, L., & Torrence, M. (2014). Implementing and Assessing Library Reference Training Programs. Reference Librarian, 55(1), 37-48.
  10. Chawner, B., & Oliver, G. (2013). A survey of New Zealand academic reference librarians: Current and future skills and competencies. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 44(1), 29-39.
  11. Chawner, B., & Oliver, G. (2012). Sustaining and transforming services to 21stcentury academic library customers.  In the LIANZA Conference Proceedings: Celebrate, Sustain, Transform. Palmerston North, New Zealand, 1-10.
  12. Nielsen, J. (2013). The blended business librarian: Technology skills in academic business librarian job advertisements.The Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 18(2), 119-128. DOI: 10.1080/08963568.2013.768849
  13. Kisilowska, M., Jasiewicz, J., Zając, M., & Paul, M. (2014). Diagnoza długfalowych efektów szkoleń bibliotekarzy województwa mazowieckiego. Badania jakościowe. Poland: Polskie Bractwo Kawalerów Gutenberga
  14. Tavassoli-Farahi, M., Tajafari, M., & Tahamtan, I. (2014). Evaluation of medical librarians’ level of information and communication technology skills based on MLA statements: A study in Iran. Library Philosophy & Practice, Paper 1140. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1140/
  15. Stuckey, W.C. (2016). Competitive employment and autism spectrum disorder: Employer perspectives (doctoral dissertation). Ball State University, IN.
  16. Engleberg, I.N., Ward, S.M., Disbrow, L.M., Katt, J.A., Myers, S.A., O’Keefe, P. (2016). The development of a set of core communication competencies for introductory communication courses. Communication Education. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2016.1159316
  17. Kulbin, J., & Virkus, S. (2015). Knowledge, skills, and attitudes of librarians in developing library users’ information literacy. In Korbanoglu, S., et. al. (Eds). Proceedings of the ECIL 2015 Conference (pp.549-557). Switerland, Springer International.
  18. Courtney, M., & Courtney, A. (2015). Step away from the desk: Re-casting the reference librarian as academic partner. In Forbes, C., & Bowers, J. (Eds.) Rethinking Reference for Academic Libraries: Innovative Developments and Future Trends (pp.  3-16). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  19. Babalhavaeji, F., Tababiyan, F., Hariri, N., & Esmaeil, S.M., (2014). Developing local model of technology competency evaluation in Iranian libraries. Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(21), 837-845.

 

Saunders, L. (2012). The reality of reference: Responsibilities and competencies for current reference librarians. Public Services Quarterly 8(2), 114-135.

  1. Bandyopadhyay, A., Boyd-Byrnes, M.K. (2016). Is the need for mediated reference service in academic libraries fading away in the digital environment? Reference Services Review, 44(4).
  2. Pierard, C, & Bordeianu, S. (2016). Learning commons reference collections in ARL libraries. Reference Services Review, 44(3).
  3. Chan, E. (2014). Analyzing Recorded Transactions to Extrapolate the Required Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities of Reference Desk Providers at an Urban, Academic/Public Library. Journal of Library Administration, 54(1), 23-32.
  4. Tomlinson, C. (2014). The benefits of internal professional development for academic librarians. Adult and Continuing Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications, 3-4, 1537-1550.
  5. Tomlinson, C. (2014). Benefits of internal professional development for academic librarians. In S.S. Hines (Ed.), Revolutionizing the Development of Library and Information Professionals: Planning for the Future, pp. 76-89. IGI Global.
  6. Dewan, P. (2014). Can I Have Your Attention? Implications of the Research on Distractions and Multitasking for Reference Librarians. Reference Librarian, 55(2), 95-117.
  7. González-Fernández-Villavicencio, N. (2012). Servicios de referencia en bibliotecas universitarias: tendencias y plan de marketing. El Profesional De La Información, 21(6), 567-576.
  8. Sproles, C., Detmering, R., & Johnson, A. (2013). Trends in the literature on library instruction and information literacy, 2001-2010.Reference Services Review, 41(3), 395-412.
  9. Detmering, R. (2013). The New Digital Scholar: Exploring and Enriching the Research and Writing Practices of NextGen Students.portal: Libraries & The Academy, 13(3), 325-327.
  10. West, W. (2013). Tag, you’re it: Enhancing access to graphic novels.portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(3), 301-324.
  11. Gibson, C., & Mandernach, M. (2013). Reference service at an inflection point: Transformation in academic libraries. In D. Mueller (Ed.),Imagine, Innovate, Inspire: The Proceedings of the ACRL 2013 Conference. Chicago, IL: ACRL.

 

Saunders, L. (June 2011). Information literacy as a student learning outcome: The perspective of institutional accreditation. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.

  1. Folk, A.L. (2016). Information literacy in the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand.portal: Libraries and the Academy, 16(1), 11-31.
  2. Virkus, S., & Mandre, S. (2015). Information literacy, leadership, and management. In S. Korbanoglu, J. Boustany, Spiranec, S., Grassian, E., D. Mizrachi, & L. Roy (Eds.)Information literacy: Moving toward sustainability Third European Conference(pp. 80-89). Switzerland: Springer International.
  3. Koltay, T., Spiranec, S., & Karvalics, L. Z. (2015). Research 2.0 and the future of information literacy. Cambridge: Chandos.
  4. Hill, L., Maier-Katkin, D., Kinsely, K. (2015). Everything old is new again: The criminology/criminal justice freshman research seminar. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(4), 493-506.
  5. Hollister, C.V., and Schroeder, R. (2015). The impact of library support on education faculty research productivity: An exploratory study. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 34(3), 97-115. doi:10.1080/01639269.2015.1062584
  6. Evans, G.E., Saponaro, M.Z., Christie, H., & Sinwell, C. (2015).Library programs and services: The fundamentals. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
  7. Cuypers, M. (2015). The international disparity of defining quality in higher education institutions: Comparing the interests of stakeholders in China, the USA, and Germany. In Klumpp, M., Zelewski, S, and Acka, N. (Eds.) International Perspectives on University Efficiency (pp. 215-227). Berlin, Germany, Logos Verlag.
  8. Grizzle, A. (2014). Enlisting media and informational literacy for gender equality and women’s empowerment. In A. V. Montiel (Ed.),Media and gender: A scholarly agenda for the global alliance on media and gender (pp. 79-91). Paris, France: UNESCO.
  9. Polepeddi, P. (2015). Making sense of the information needs for acquisition of information literacy skills of English-speaking new African immigrants: A case study of Ethiopian women at Eloise May Library, Denver, Colorado, USA (doctoral dissertation). Emporia State University, NY.
  10. Heilman, E.B. (2014). Composition students’ research experience at a rural community college: A qualitative case study (doctoral dissertation). Drexel University, PA.
  11. Bradley, C. (2013). Information literacy in the programmatic university accreditation standards of select professions in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. Journal of Information Literacy, 7(1):44-68. DOI: 10.11645/7.1.1785
  12. Hernon, P., & Schwartz, C. (2012). The assessment craze. Library & information science research, 34(2).
  13. Becher, M. (2013). Instruction coordinators and higher education accreditation: A study of awareness and assessment documentation.The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 573-581. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2013.04.003
  14. Bradley, C. (2013). Information use skills in the engineering programme accreditation criteria of four countries. European Journal of Engineering Education, (ahead-of-print), 1-15.
  15. Gratz, A., & Twombly Olson, L. (2014). Evolution of a Culture of Assessment: Developing a Mixed-Methods Approach for Evaluating Library Instruction.College & Undergraduate Libraries, 21(2), 210-231.
  16. Veach, G. L. (2012). Tracing Boundaries, Effacing Boundaries: Information Literacy as an Academic Discipline(Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida).

 

Hernon, P., & Saunders, L. (July 2009). The federal depository library program in 2023: One perspective on the transition to the future. College & Research Libraries, 70(4), 351-370.

  1. Casey, A.M., Cawthorne, J.E., & Citro, K. (2014). Gazing into the crystal ball: Using scenarios for future visioning of a distance learning library service.Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3/4), 181-203. doi: 1080/1533290X.2014.945834
  2. Holley, R.P. (2013). Library space and technology. In G. Walton & G. Matthews (Eds), University Libraries and Space in a Digital World, pp. 51-70. New York, NY: Routledge.
  3. Schonfeld, R. C., & Housewright, R. (2009). Documents for a digital democracy: A model for the Federal Depository Library Program in the 21st Century. ITHAKA.
  4. Carpenter, M., Graybill, J., Offord Jr, J., & Piorun, M. (2011). Envisioning the library’s role in scholarly communication in the year 2025. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), 659-681.
  5. Brown, C. C. (2011). Knowing Where They Went: Six Years of Online Access Statistics via the Online Catalog for Federal Government Information. College & Research Libraries, 72(1), 43-61.
  6. Agne, L. R. (2010). User-Centered Designs for Library Government Information Websites. Indiana Libraries, 29(1), 3-10.
  7. Malenfant, K. J. (2011). Understanding Faculty Perceptions of the Future: Action Research for Academic Librarians (Doctoral dissertation, Antioch University).
  8. Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2012). Research & Publications No results for. Teaching & Learning.
  9. Attebury, R. Government Information Use at the University of Idaho: The Results of a National Depository Library Survey.
  10. Cawthorne, J. (2013).Viewing the future of university research libraries through the perspective of scenarios. (Doctoral dissertation, Simmons College).
  11. Walter, T.O. (2014). The future of knowledge creation and production in university research programs and their effect on university libraries. (Doctoral dissertation, Simmons College).

 

Saunders, L. (2009). The future of information literacy: A Delphi study. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(1), 99-114.

  1. Dawes, L. (2017). Faculty perceptions of teaching information literacy to first-year students: A phenomenographic study. The Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. doi: 10.1177/0961000617726129
  2. Roberson, E.C. (2016). Community college composition faculty in information literacy assessment: A qualitative phenomenological exploration (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (10169625).
  3. Townsend, L., Hofer, A.R., Hanick, S.L., & Brunetti, K. (2016). Identifying threshold concepts for information literacy: A Delphi study. Communications in Information Literacy, 10(1), 23-49.
  4. Nowkarizi, M. (2016). Information literacy skills and related factors among librarians of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. Fzdysy Mashhad. Hzyshyt AalAt Salht, 13(2), 101-109.
  5. Brooks, A. W., & Chestnut, M.T. (2016). Divide and conquer: A not-so-common approach to develop information literacy programs. Practical Academic Librarianship: The International Journal of the SLA Academic Division, 6(1), 1-18.
  6. Robinson, L. (2015). Immersive information behaviour: Using the documents of the future. New Library World, 116(3-4), 112-121.
  7. Baykoucheva, S. (2015). Managing scientific information and research data. Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing.
  8. Ponjuan, G., Pinto, M., Uribe-Tirado, A. (2015). Concepts and perspectives of information literacy in Latin America: A delphi study.Information Research, 20(3).
  9. Aharony, N., & Bronstein, J. (2014). Academic librarians’ perceptions of information literacy: The Israeli perspective.portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(1), 103-119.
  10. Poirier, E. & Robinson, L. (2014). Slow Delphi: An investigation into information behavior and the slow movement.Journal of Information Science, 40(1), 88-96. DOI: 10.1177/0165551513506360
  11. Ju, B., & Jin, T. (2013). Incorporating nonparametric tests into Delphi studies in library and information science.Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 18(3).
  12. Smith, J. K. (2013). Secondary teachers and information literacy (IL): Teacher understanding and perceptions of IL in the classroom.Library and Information Science Research, 35(3): 216-222.
  13. Wang, X. (2010).Integrating information literacy into higher education curricula: An IL curricular integration model. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/41747/
  14. Badke, W. (2012). Teaching research processes: The faculty role in development of skilled student researchers. Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing.
  15. Germek, G. (2012). Empowered library elearning: Capturing assessment and learning with ease, efficiency, and effectiveness.Reference Services Review, 40(1), 90-102.
  16. Corrall, S. (2010). Educating the academic librarian as a blended professional: a review and case study.Library Management, 31(8/9), 567-593.
  17. Chen, L. S. (2010). Applying swarm intelligence to a library system.Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 34(1), 1-10.
  18. Inzerilla, T.E. (2012).Community college faculty’s teaching social networks and their implications for librarians. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/62700/
  19. Tiemensma, L. (2012). Information literacy education in higher education institutions in South Africa. In R. Gwyer, R. Stubbings, & G. Walton (Eds.).The Road to Information Literacy: Librarians as Facilitators of Learning,  The Hague, Netherlands: IFLA Publications.
  20. Herrington, V. (2013). The Academic Library: Cowpath or Path to the Future? Journal of Library Innovation, 4(2), 54-68. Retrieved from http://www.libraryinnovation.org/article/view/278/492
  21. Grigas, G. (2013). Sistemų teorijos taikymas kuriant Bibliotekininko edukatoriaus ugdymo koncepcinį Modelį, taikomą profesionalius bibliotekininkus Rengiančioje studijų programoje.Tiltai: Bridges, Brucken, 3(64): 165-190. Retrieved from http://www.ku.lt/leidykla/files/2012/09/Tiltai_2013_3.pdf#page=168
  22. Dent Goodman, V. (2011). Qualitative research and the modern library. Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing
  23. Pinto, M. (2011). An Approach to the Internal Facet of Information Literacy Using the IL-HUMASS Survey.The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(2), 145-154.
  24. Germek, G. (2012). The Lack of Assessment in the Academic Library Plagiarism Prevention Tutorial.College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(1), 1-17.
  25. Badke, W. (2011). Why information literacy is invisible.Communications in Information Literacy, 4(2), 129-141.
  26. McDonald, S., & McDonald, J. (2011). Information literacy for ubiquitous learning. In Information Online 2011,ALIA 15th Conference and Exhibition, 1-3 Feb 2011.
  27. Welsh, T.S., & Wright, M.S. (2010). Information literacy in the digital age: An evidence-based approach. Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing
  28. Townley, C. T. (2009). The Innovation Challenge: Transformational Leadership in Technological University Libraries. InIatul Proceedings (pp. 1-7).
  29. Davis, E. L., Lundstrom, K., & Martin, P. N. (2011). Librarian perceptions and information literacy instruction models.Reference Services Review, 39(4), 686-702.
  30. Wang, L., Bruce, C., & Hughes, H. (2011). Sociocultural Theories and Their Application in Information Literacy Research and Education.Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 42(4), 296-308.
  31. Hufford, J. R. (2013). A Review of the Literature on Assessment in Academic and Research Libraries, 2005 to August 2011.portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(1), 5-35.
  32. Lepik, K. (2010, January). Tartu University Library as a medium between different patrons. InQualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries: Theory and Applications: Proceedings of the International Conference on QQML2009. World Scientific Publishing Company Incorporated, 141.
  33. Tiemensma, L. (2012). Information Literacy Education in Higher Education Institutions in South Africa. In. R. Gwyer, R. Stubbgings, & G. Walton (Eds.)The Road to Information Literacy: Librarians as facilitators of learning, The Hague, Netherlands: IFLA Publications, 157, 155.
  34. Forster, M. (2009). “SEARCH for Health”: Developing a Credited Module in Health Information Skills.New Review of Academic Librarianship, 15(2), 160-172.
  35. Bruch, C., & Wilkinson, C. W. (2012). Surveying terrain, clearing pathways. In C.W. Wilkinson and C. Bruch (Eds.).Transforming Information Literacy Programs: Complex Frontiers of Self, Library Culture, and Campus Community, Chicago, IL: ACRL, 3-44.
  36. Seymour, Celene. Ethnographic Study of Information Literacy Librarians’ Work Experience: A Report from Two States.” In C. W. Wilkinson & C. Bruch (Eds.).Transforming Information Literacy Programs: Intersecting Frontiers of Self, Library Culture, and Campus Community, Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2012. N. pag. Print.
  37. Malenfant, K. J. (2011).Understanding Faculty Perceptions of the Future: Action Research for Academic Librarians (Doctoral dissertation, Antioch University).
  38. Oakleaf, M. (2010).The Value of Academic Libraries: A Comprehensive Research Review and Report. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. http:http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/value/val_report.pdf
  39. Ricigliano, L. (2013). Stepping Up Your Game: Responding to Evolving Regional Accreditation Standards. In D. Mueller (Ed.)A Declaration of Interdependence: The Proceedings of the ACRL 2011 Conference, Philadelphia, PA: ACRL.
  40. Singson, Mangkhollen and Lhungdim, T. (2012). Curriculum based approach to information literacy education. InNational Seminar on Information and Communication Technology in Education, Shillong (India), 3th -15th of September, 2011.
  41. Pinto, M. (2011). An approach to the internal facet of information literacy using the IL-HUMASS Survey.The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(2), 145-154.
  42. de Hotelería, E., & de la Juventud, T. I. Título: Los estudios de futuro en el campo de la Bibliotecología y la Ciencia de la Información.Análisis bibliométrico Autor: MsC. Odalys González-Santos (Doctorante de la UGR).
  43. Pochet, B. (2012).La littérature scientifique dans la formation des bioingénieurs à Gembloux. Vingt années d’évolution du concept d’Information Literacy (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/135460
  44. Jumonville, A. & Mitchell, E.(2014). The role of faculty autonomy in a course-integrated information literacy program. Reference Services Review, 42(4).
  45. Lawal, V., Underwood, P., Lwehabura, M., & Stilwell, C. (2007). Information literacy for higher education institutions in Nigeria and Tanzania: Efforts and prospects for educational reform in teaching and learning. Innovation, 41, 42-61. doi:10.4314/innovation.v41i1.63628
  46. Hinchliffe, L.J., Oakleaf, M., & Davis, M.E. (2010). The value of academic libraries: Findings and implications for the profession. In Hiller, S., Justh, K., Kyrillidou, M., & Self, J. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2010 Library Assessment Conference (pp. 485-498). Washington, D.C., ARL.

 

Saunders, L. (2008). Perspectives on accreditation and information literacy as reflected in the literature of library and information science. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(4), 305-313.

  1. Bradley, C. (2013). Information literacy in the programmatic university accreditation standards of select professions in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. Journal of Information Literacy, 7(1):44-68. DOI: 10.11645/7.1.1785
  2. Oakleaf, M. (2010). The Value of Academic Libraries: A Comprehensive Research Review and Report. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. http:http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/value/val_report.pdf
  3. Anthony, K. (2010). Reconnecting the disconnects: Library outreach to faculty as addressed in the literature. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 17(1), 79-92.
  4. Gordon, L., & Bartoli, E. (2012). Using Discipline-Based Professional Association Standards for Information Literacy Integration: A Review and Case Study. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 31(1), 23-38.
  5. Carr, J. A. (2012). Crossing the Instructional Divide: Supporting K-20 Information Literacy Initiatives. . In C.W. Wilkinson and C. Bruch (Eds.).Transforming Information Literacy Programs: Complex Frontiers of Self, Library Culture, and Campus Community, Chicago, IL: ACRL, 153.
  6. Samson, S. (2010). Information literacy learning outcomes and student success. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(3), 202-210.
  7. Bury, S. (2011). Faculty attitudes, perceptions, and experiences of information literacy: A study across multiple disciplines at York University, Canada. Journal of Information Literacy, 5(1), 45-64.
  8. Pinto, M. (2011). An approach to the internal facet of information literacy using the IL-HUMASS Survey. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(2), 145-154.
  9. Becher, M. (2013). Instruction coordinators and higher education accreditation: A study of awareness and assessment documentation.The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 573-581. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2013.04.003
  10. Stowe, B. (2013). Designing and implementing an information literacy instruction outcomes assessment program.College & Undergraduate Libraries, 20(3/4), 242-276. DOI: 10.1080/10691316.2013.829363
  11. Harris, B. R. (2013). Subversive infusions: Strategies for the integration of information literacy across the curriculum. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(2), 175-180. DOI:1016/j.acalib.2012.10.003
  12. Fleming-May, R., & Sherline, C. (2010). What impact do academic librarians have on teaching and learning? A review of the literature and preliminary taxonomy of standards. In the Proceedings of the 2010 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment, Baltimore, MD: ACRL, 499-514.
  13. Jumonville, A. & Mitchell, E. (2014). The role of faculty autonomy in a course-integrated information literacy program. Reference Services Review, 42(4).
  14. Hinchliffe, L.J., Oakleaf, M., & Davis, M.E. (2010). The value of academic libraries: Findings and implications for the profession. In Hiller, S., Justh, K., Kyrillidou, M., & Self, J. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2010 Library Assessment Conference (pp. 485-498). Washington, D.C., ARL.
  15. Fleming-May, R.A., & Sherline, C. (2010). What impact do academic libraries have on teaching and learning? A review of the literature and preliminary taxonomy of standards. In Hiller, S., Justh, K., Kyrillidou, M., & Self, J. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2010 Library Assessment Conference (pp. 499-514). Washington, D.C., ARL.
  16. Mulherrin, E.A., & Abdul-Hamid, H. (2009). The evolution of a testing tool for measuring undergraduate information literacy skills in the online environment. Communications in Information Literacy, 3(2), 204-215.

 

Saunders, L. (2008). Exploring connections between information retrieval systems and information literacy standards. Library and Information Science Research 30(2), 86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2007.10.003

  1. Sun, S.Y., & Chen, L.S. (2013). Design and implementation of safety learning system to cram school.International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 6(2), 167-178.
  2. Chan, L.S. (2010). Application of RFID and neuro-fuzzy to safety learning.Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 13(4), 713-723.
  3. Kuo, F.R., & Hwong, G.J. (2013). A five-phase learning cycle approach to improving the web-based problem solving performance of students.Educational Technology and Society, 17(1), 169-184.
  4. Catalano, A.J. (2010). Using ACRL standards to assess the information literacy of graduate students in an education program.Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 5(4), 21-38.

 

Saunders, L. (2007). Regional accreditation organizations’ treatment of information literacy: Definitions, outcomes and assessment. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(3), 317-326. 

  1. Jackson, B. (2017). The representation of library value in extra-institutional evaluations of university quality. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 47(1), 80-96. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/lidano/Downloads/186493-201600-1-PB.pdf
  2. Pinkley, J., Hoffman, D. (2017). Opportunities in disguise: The continuing evolution of an authentic information literacy assessment. Codex: The Journal of the Louisiana Chapter of the ACRL, 4(2). Retrieved from http://journal.acrlla.org/index.php/codex/article/view/125
  3. Sparks, J.R., Katz, I.R., & Beile, P.M. (2016). Assessing digital information literacy in higher education: A review of existing frameworks and assessments with recommendations for next-generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series. doi:10.1002/ets2.12118
  4. Bensen, B., Woetzel, D., Wu, H., & Hashmi, G. (2016). Impacting information literacy through alignment, resources, and assessment. In D’Angelo, B.J., Jameison, S., Maid, B., & Walker, J.R. (Eds.), Information literacy: Research and collaboration across disciplines (pp. 401-425). Fort Collins, Colorado: WAC Clearinghouse and University Press of Colorado.
  5. Mezick, E.M., & Hiris, L. (2016). Using rubrics for assessing information literacy in the finance classroom: A collaboration. The Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 12(2), 95-113. doi:10.1080/08963568.2016.1169970
  6. Folk, A.L. (2016). Information literacy in the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand.portal: Libraries and the Academy, 16(1), 11-31.
  7. Hill, L., Maier-Katkin, D., Kinsely, K. (2015). Everything old is new again: The criminology/criminal justice freshman research seminar. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(4), 493-506.
  8. Cohen, M.E. (2015). The flipped classroom as a tool for engaging discipline faculty in collaboration: A case study in library-business collaboration.New Review of Academic Librarianship. doi: 1080/13614533.2015.1073162
  9. Zai III, R. (2015). Neither fish nor fowl: A role theory approach to librarians teaching. The Journal of Library Administration, 55(1), 1-23. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2014.978680
  10. Mezick, E. M. (2014). Relationship of library assessment to student retention. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(1), 31-36.
  11. Bradley, C. (2014). Information use skills in the engineering programme accreditation criteria of four countries.European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(1), 97-111.
  12. Folk, AL. (2014). How well are we preparing them? An assessment of first year library student assistants’ information literacy skills. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 21(2), 177-192. DOI: 10.1080/10691316.2013.829377
  13. Weiner, S. (2014). Who teaches information literacy competencies? Report of a study of Faculty.College Teaching, 62(1), 5-12. DOI: 10.1080/87567555.2013.803949
  14. Karim, A. A. (2014). Exploring student learning of information skills in Malaysian higher education (doctoral dissertation). Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
  15. Clement, G., and Brenenson, S. (2013). Theft of the mind: An innovative approach to plagiarism and copyright education. In S. Davis-Kahl and M. K. Hensley (Eds.)Common Ground at the Nexus of Information Literacy and Scholarly Communication. Chicago, IL: ACRL.
  16. Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2013). Addressing below proficient information literacy skills: Evaluating the efficacy of an evidence-based educational intervention.Library and Information Science Research, 35(3), 181-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.03.001
  17. Becher, M. (2013). Instruction coordinators and higher education accreditation: A study of awareness and assessment documentation.The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 573-581. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2013.04.003
  18. Bradley, C. (2013). Information literacy in the programmatic university accreditation standards of select professions in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia.Journal of Information Literacy, 7(1):44-68. DOI: 10.11645/7.1.1785
  19. Noe, N. W. (2013). Creating and maintaining an information literacy instruction program in the twenty-first century: An ever-changing landscape. Cambridge, MA: Chandos
  20. Costella, J., Adam, T., Gray, F., Nolan, N., Wilkins, C. (2013). Undergraduate program review processes: A case study in opportunities for academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(2),169-174.
  21. Dubicki, E. (2013). Faculty perceptions of students’ information literacy skills competencies.Journal of Information Literacy, 7(2), 97-125. DOI: 10.11645/7.2.1852
  22. Hernon, P., Dugan, R., & Schwartz, C. (2013).Higher Education Outcomes Assessment for the Twenty-first Century. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio
  23. Stowe, B. (2013). Designing and implementing an information literacy instruction outcomes assessment program.College & Undergraduate Libraries, 20(3/4), 242-276. DOI: 10.1080/10691316.2013.829363
  24. Walsh, J. B. (2013).The effects of targeted, connectivism-based information literacy instruction on Latino students information literacy skills and library usage behavior. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/312502
  25. Weiner, S., Jackman, L., & Prause, E. (2013). Strategizing for Public Policy: The Information Literacy State Proclamation Project.Public Services Quarterly, 9(4), 284-299.
  26. Weiner, Sharon A. (2013) “Overview: The Role of Information Policy in Resolving Global Challenges,” Global Policy Research Institute (GPRI) Policy Briefs, 1(1), Article 6. Available at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/gpripb/vol1/iss1/6
  27. Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2011). Experiences with and perceptions of information: A phenomenographic study of first-year college students.Library Quarterly, 81(2), 161-186. http: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&sid=90b00f62-ad4d-41ce-b75b-d695d9add096%40sessionmgr104&hid=128
  28. Tyron, J., Frigo, E. E., & O’Kelly, M.K. (2010). Using teaching faculty focus groups to assess information literacy core competencies at university level.The Journal of Information Literacy, 4(2), 62-77. http:http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&sid=90b00f62-ad4d-41ce-b75b-d695d9add096%40sessionmgr104&hid=128
  29. Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2012). What’s skill got to do with it? Information literacy skills and self-views of ability among first-year college students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 63(3), 574-583. doi: 10.1002/asi.21681
  30. Oxford, R.L. (2010). Library 2.0 and information competency in California community college distance education programs: A descriptive study (doctoral dissertation). California State University Fresno, CA.
  31. Simon, C. (2009). Graduate business students and business information literacy: A novel approach.Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 14(3), 248-267. doi:10.1080/08963560802361981
  32. Rollins, D. C., Hutchings, J., Goldsmith, M.U.D., & Fonesca, A.J. (2009). Are we there yet? The difficult road to re-create information literacy.portal: Libraries & The Academy, 9(4), 453-473. http: http://0-muse.jhu.edu.library.simmons.edu/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/v009/9.4.rollins.html
  33. Brasley, S. S. (2008). Effective librarian and discipline faculty collaboration models for integrating information literacy into the fabric of an academic institution.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(114), 71-88.
  34. Stock, L. A. H. (2008). Exploring the development of information literacy concepts among community college students (doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Iowa.
  35. McAdoo, M. L. (2008).A case study of faculty perceptions of information literacy and its integration into the curriculum (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania).
  36. Pierce, D. L. (2009). Influencing the now and future faculty: Retooling information literacy.Notes, 66(2), 233-248.
  37. Weiner, S. (2011). How information literacy becomes policy: an analysis using the multiple streams framework.Library Trends, 60(2), 297-311.
  38. Hsieh, M. L., & Holden, H. A. (2010). The effectiveness of a university’s single-session information literacy instruction.Reference Services Review, 38(3), 458-473.
  39. Hsieh, M., & Dawson, P. (2010, November). A University’s Information Literacy Assessment Program Using Google Docs. In F. Baudino, C. Ury, & S. G. Park (Eds.),Brick and click libraries: Proceedings of an academic library symposium (10th, Maryville, Missouri, November 5, 2010).
  40. ChanLin, L. J. (2009, June). Use of learning strategies in web-based project tasks. InWorld Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2009 (1), 1677-1682.
  41. Shelley, A. (2009). Beyond Buzz Words and Skill Sets: The Role of Critical Thinking in Information Literacy.Library Student Journal, 4.
  42. Hufford, J. R. (2013). A Review of the Literature on Assessment in Academic and Research Libraries, 2005 to August 2011.portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(1), 5-35.
  43. Costella, J., Adam, T., Gray, F., Nolan, N., & Wilkins, C. (2012). Undergraduate Program Review Processes: A Case Study in Opportunity for Academic Libraries.The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(2), 169-174. DOI: 1016/j.acalib.2012.09.016
  44. Harris, B. R. (2012). Subversive infusions: Strategies for the integration of information literacy across the curriculum.The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(2), 175-180. DOI: 1016/j.acalib.2012.10.003
  45. Martin, H, & Hesseldenz, P. (2011). Library resources and services in 21st century online education. In S. Kelsey & K. St. Amant (Eds.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Issues and Approaches in Education, pp. 33-49. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  46. Walsh, J. (2011). Information literacy instruction: Selecting an effective model. Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing
  47. Ryesky, K. H. (2007). On solid legal ground: Bringing information literacy to undergraduate-level law courses.Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(2), 21-35.
  48. Markgren, S., Eastman, C., & Bloom, L.M. (2009). Librarian as collaborator: Bringing e-learning 2.0 into the classroom by way of the library. In H.H. Yang & S.C. Yuen (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Practices and Outcomes in e-Learning: Issues and Trends, pp.26–277. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  49. Byrd, C. N. (2009). Teachers’ perceptions of educational research: A self-efficacy perspective(Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University).
  50. Accardi, M. T. (2010). Teaching Against the Grain: Critical Assessment in the Library Classroom. In M. Accardi, E. Drabinski, and A. Kumbier (Eds.)Critical Library Instruction: Theories and Methods. Duluth, MN: Utwin Books.
  51. DaCosta, J. W., & Dubicki, E. (2012). From Lampitt to Libraries: Formulating State Standards to Embed Information Literacy across Colleges.Library Trends, 60(3), 611-636.
  52. Oakleaf, M. (2010).The Value of Academic Libraries: A Comprehensive Research Review and Report. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. http:http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/value/val_report.pdf
  53. Fleming-May, R.A., & Sherline, C. (2010). What impact do academic libraries have on teaching and learning? A review of the literature and preliminary taxonomy of standards. In Hiller, S., Justh, K., Kyrillidou, M., & Self, J. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2010 Library Assessment Conference (pp. 499-514). Washington, D.C., ARL.

 

Hernon, P., Hopper, R., Leach, M., Saunders, L., & Zhang, J. (2007). E-book use by students: Undergraduates in economics, literature, and nursing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(1), 3-13.

  1. Lim, E., & Hew, K. F., (2014). Students’ perceptions of the usefulness of an ebook with annotative and sharing capabilities as a tool for learning: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 34-45.
  2. Guillon, O., & Theirry, C. (2013). Is ebook pricing structured to mirror paper book prices? The case of France and the USA in 2011.Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 37(3), 207-224.
  3. Lamothe, A. R. (2013). Factors influencing the usage of an electronic book collection: Size of the ebook collection, the student population and the faculty population.College & Research Libraries, 74(1), 39-59.
  4. Keller, A. (2012). In print or on screen? Investigating the reading habits of undergraduate students using photo-diaries and photo-interviews.LIBRI, 62(1), 1-18.
  5. Wu, M., & Chen, S. (2011). Graduate students’ usage of and attitudes towards ebooks: Experiences from Taiwan.Program Electronic and Library Information Systems, 45(3), 294-307.
  6. Hernon, P., & Schwartz, C. (2008). Living with the consequence.Library and Information Science Research, 30(2), 79.
  7. Stoop, J., Kreutzer, P., & Kircz, J. G. (2013). Reading and learning from screens versus print: A study in changing habits part 1. Reading long information rich texts.New Library World, 114(7/8), 3.
  8. Shepherd, J., Arteaga, R. (2014). Social work students and ebooks: A survey of use and perceptions.Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 33(1), 15-28.
  9. Rod-Welch, L. J., Weeg, B. E., & Caswell, J. V. (2013). Relative preferences for paper and electronic books: Implications for reference services, library instruction, and collection management.Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 18(3-4), 281-303.
  10. Asunka, S. (2013). The viability of e-textbooks in developing countries: Ghanaian university students’ perceptions. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28(1), 36-50.
  11. Chou, I. C. (2014). Reading for the purpose of responding to literature: EFL students’ perceptions of e-books. Computer Assisted Language Learning, (ahead-of-print), 1-20.
  12. Ciampa, M., Thrasher, E., Marston, S., & Revels, M. (2013). Is acceptance of e-textbooks discipline-dependent? Comparing business and non-business student perceptions. Research in Higher Education Journal, 20.
  13. Lai, H., & Li, M. (2014). A study of university student behaviors in using eBooks in Hong Kong. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL), 5(4), 455-467.
  14. Ryu, J., Lim, T.,リュジホン, & リム,テヒョン. (2014). The Effects of E-book Reading Purposes and Screen Formats on Reading Performance and Cognitive Loads of College Students.
  15. Bratanek, L. A. (2013). Case Study of E-book Use in an Academic Library: A Communication Perspective(Doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa).
  16. Lam, P., Lam, S. L., Lam, J., & McNaught, C. (2009). Usability and usefulness of eBooks on PPCs: How students’ opinions vary over time. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 30-44.
  17. Sprague, N., & Hunter, B. (2008). Assessing e-books: Taking a closer look at e-book statistics. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 32(3), 150-157.
  18. Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the same page: undergraduates’ information retrieval in electronic and print books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(6), 518-525.
  19. Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., & Jamali, H. R. (2010). E-textbook use, information seeking behaviour and its impact: Case study business and management. Journal of Information Science, 36(2), 263-280.
  20. Cox, J. (2008). Making sense of e-book usage data. The Acquisitions Librarian, 19(3-4), 193-212.
  21. Folb, B. L., Wessel, C. B., & Czechowski, L. J. (2011). Clinical and academic use of electronic and print books: The Health Sciences Library System e-book study at the University of Pittsburgh. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 99(3), 218.
  22. Lamothe, A. R. (2010). Electronic book usage patterns as observed at an academic library: Searches and viewings. Partnership: the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 5(1).
  23. Lamothe, A. R. (2013). Comparing Linear Relationships Between E-Book Usage and University Student and Faculty Populations: The Differences Between E-Reference and E-Monograph Collections. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 25(1), 1-15.
  24. Pomerantz, S. (2010). The availability of e-books: examples of nursing and business. Collection Building, 29(1), 11-14.
  25. Shrimplin, A. K., Revelle, A., Hurst, S., & Messner, K. (2011). Contradictions and Consensus–Clusters of Opinions on E-books. College & Research Libraries, 72(2), 181-190.
  26. Ball, R. (2009). E-books in practice: the librarian’s perspective. Learned Publishing, 22(1), 18-22.
  27. Shin, D. H. (2011). Understanding e-book users: Uses and gratification expectancy model. New Media & Society, 13(2), 260-278.
  28. Grudzien, P., & Casey, A. M. (2008). Do Off-Campus Students Use E-Books?. Journal of Library Administration, 48(3-4), 455-466.
  29. Slater, R. (2010). Why aren’t e-books gaining more ground in academic libraries? E-book use and perceptions: a review of published literature and research. Journal of Web Librarianship, 4(4), 305-331.
  30. McKay, D. (2011, November). A jump to the left (and then a step to the right): reading practices within academic ebooks. In Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (pp. 202-210). ACM.
  31. Grigg, K. S., Koestner, B. A., Peterson, R. A., & Thibodeau, P. L. (2010). Data-driven collection management: through crisis emerge opportunities. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 7(1), 1-12.
  32. Messner, K., Revelle, A., Shrimplin, A., & Hurst, S. (2011, March). Book lovers, technophiles, printers, and pragmatists: The social and demographic structure of user attitudes toward e-books. In Declaration of Interdependence: The Proceedings of the ACRL 2011 Conference (pp. 52-57).
  33. Ball, D., Beard, J., & Newland, B. (2008). E-books and Virtual Learning Environments: Responses to a Transformational Technology. The Acquisitions Librarian, 19(3-4), 165-182.
  34. Lam, P., Lam, J., & McNaught, C. (2010). How usable are eBooks in an mLearning environment?. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 20(1), 6-20.
  35. Mundle, K. (2008). Integration of electronic books into library catalogs: The UIC library experience. The Acquisitions Librarian, 19(3-4), 389-407.
  36. Chen, S. C. (2011). Graduate students’ usage of and attitudes towards e-books: experiences from Taiwan. Program: electronic library and information systems, 45(3), 294-307.
  37. Camacho, L., & Spackman, A. (2010). Transitioning to E-books: Usage and attitudes among business faculty. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 16(1), 33-45.
  38. Lau, J. (2008). Students’ experience of using electronic textbooks in different levels of education. Scroll, 1(1).
  39. Hightower, B. E., & Gantt, J. T. (2011). Weeding nursing e-books in an academic library. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services.
  40. Mundt, S. (2007). Akzeptanz und Nutzung von E-Books: eine Literaturstudie. Universitätsbibliothek der Universität Stuttgart.
  41. Revelle, A., Messner, K., Shrimplin, A., & Hurst, S. (2012). Book Lovers, Technophiles, Pragmatists, and Printers: The social and demographic structure of user attitudes toward e-books. College & Research Libraries, 73(5), 420-429.
  42. Blummer, B., & Kenton, J. (2012). Best practices for integrating e-books in academic libraries: a literature review from 2005 to present. Collection Management, 37(2), 65-97.
  43. McKay, D., Buchanan, G., Vanderschantz, N., Timpany, C., Cunningham, S. J., & Hinze, A. (2012, November). Judging a book by its cover: interface elements that affect reader selection of ebooks. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (pp. 381-390). ACM.
  44. McNeish, J., Foster, M., Francescucci, A., & West, B. (2012). The Surprising Foil to Online Education: Why Students Won’t Give Up Paper Textbooks. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 20(3), 37.
  45. Azelin, M. N., Embong, A. M., & Abdullah, M. R. T. L. (2012). E-Books in Malaysian Primary Schools: The Terengganu Chapter.
  46. O’Neill, L. (2009, April). A Usability Study of E-book Platforms. In Annual LAUN-CH (Librarians’ Association at UNC-Chapel Hill) Research Forum, Chapel Hill, NC. May (Vol. 20, pp. 08-09).
  47. Vázquez-burguete, J. L., Lanero, A., Gutiérrez, P., & García, M. P. (2012). Analyzing patterns of use of electronic books in a sample of spanish undergraduates. Implications for marketing in university libraries.Permanent Study Group: Public and Nonprofit Marketing Proceedings,
  48. Brown, R. (2011). STUDENT ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF E-READER TECHNOLOGY AND E-BOOKS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO TEXTBOOKS. In Academy of Educational Leadership (Vol. 16, No. 2, p. 5).
  49. Husted, J. T., & Czechowski, L. J. (2012). Rethinking the Reference Collection: Exploring Benchmarks and E-Book Availability. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 31(3), 267-279.
  50. Kaba, A., & Said, R. (2012). Usage of Electronic Books: A Study of ebrary Database in the United Arab Emirates. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 32(2).
  51. Staiger, J. (2012). How E-books Are Used. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 51(4), 355-365.
  52. Carter, C. E. (2011). Undergraduate Science Students are Uncertain of How to Find Facts in E-books Compared to Print Books. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 6(2), 48-50.
  53. Tucker, J. C. (2012). Ebook collection analysis: subject and publisher trends. Collection Building, 31(2), 40-47.
  54. Sinha, R., & Tucker, C. (2008). Moving from Book to E-book. The Acquisitions Librarian, 19(3-4), 353-365.
  55. Waheed, A. (2012). Collection Management of e-books: A Developing Country Perspective. World Digital Libraries, 5(1), 37-49.
  56. Hoseth, A., & McLure, M. (2012). Perspectives on E-books from instructors and students in the social sciences. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 51(3), 278-288.
  57. Lamothe, A. R. (2012). Comparing Usage Patterns Recorded between an Electronic Reference and an Electronic Monograph Collection: The Differences in Searches and Full-Text Content Viewings. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 24(2), 101-118.
  58. O’Hare, S., & Smith, A. J. (2012). The Customer Is Always Right? Resistance from College Students to E-Books as Textbooks. Kansas Library Association College and University Libraries Section Proceedings, 2, 35-41.
  59. Feredj, P., & St-Cyr, S. (2009). Les conséquences de l’avènement de la publication électronique pour le Service des bibliothèques et archives de l’Université de Sherbrooke. Mémoires du livre, 1(1).